Category: Media Criticism

  • Poirot 1

    Japp, Poirot, Felicity Lemon (who does not have much to do in the episodes I watched) and Hastings.

    Netflix having cruelly torn from my grasp the miserable second season of Star Trek: The Next Generation, I’ve found myself at a loss for the low-key lunchtime (or teatime) entertainment you can only get from an early nineties TV show of utterly imposing length. Fortunately the streaming giant takes with the left hand but gives with the right, and in place of faintly cerebral sci-fi I’ve been granted stewardship of the complete Agatha Christie’s Poirot, a perplexingly good ITV show (ITV not being reknowned nowadays for quality drama, or quality anything really) which was produced starting in 1989 and ran all the way through to 2014, by which point it had apparently adapted every single Poirot story there exists to adapt.

    Poirot himself is one of the great canonical fictional detectives, most famously taking the central role in Murder on the Orient Express. Portrayed here by David Suchet, he’s a diminutive but formidable Belgian with some considerable affection for Britain, fussy and exacting in his preferences, especially fashion. It’s a role that is given to camp, with both Peter Ustinov and Kenneth Branagh bringing out that quality first and foremost in their film adaptations. Suchet pulls the character back just the slightest bit, hewing closer to Albert Finney’s portrayal of the detective as a sharp, deliberative man who keeps his moustache in a little net at night.

    The series is almost exclusively set in a suspiciously modern rendition of the late nineteen thirties, with ‘modern’ here used in the aesthetic sense. Poirot encounters a surely improbable number of groundbreaking works of architecture in the course of his investigations, with his own apartment an Art Deco tower block in Farrington which becomes a regular establishing shot. Christie’s novels are often concerned with the sun setting on the British Imperial aristocracy, that world of upstairs-downstairs class relations, endlessly suspicious overseas arrangements, and baffled naiveté about the realities of life. Making the encroachment of modernity into this world visual is the master-stroke of Agatha Christie’s Poirot and (to my memory) persists all the way through the show.

    I’ve been watching episodes at random thus far, so in no particular order:

    The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

    One of the big guns for my first outing here, an adaptation of one of Christie’s most famous books full stop. The thing it’s most famous for is unfortunately a big twist, and despite my general antipathy towards worrying about spoilers that seems a mean way to lead into this set of reviews. Suffice to say that it’s a fine mystery, and rendered here with appropriately modern trimmings: Ackroyd is something of a modernist, and his butler proudly exclaims at one point that unlike many modernist buildings, Ackroyd’s house has been purposefully built to accommodate the movement of service staff. A central plot point hinges on Ackroyd’s possession of a dictaphone, as murder mystery plots are wont to do, and the device in question is a gorgeous old thing the size of a briefcase.

    On the negative, there’s a second murder here which somewhat strains credulity in how it’s depicted here, in additional to being a little mean-spirited. Maybe in the book there’s a bit more of a motivation for it, here it seems chiefly designed to lend drama to an ad break.

    Character Actor Watch

    The titular Ackroyd in this – Malcolm Terris – is surely best known as the ‘WEAKLING SCUM’ guy from The Horns of Nimon. Dr Shepherd – Oliver Ford Davies – comes in a close second place as the alter ego of Naboo’s own Sio Bibble. I probably should care that there’s a brief appearance by Lee Adama from Battlestar Galactica, but I’ve never seen it so I don’t.

    The Affair at Styles

    Winding back the clock for this second watch, The Affair at Styles being something of a Poirot origin story, though not nearly so naff as that makes it sound. It takes place during the First World War, with Poirot a refugee from Belgium staying with another of other ex-patriots in a countryside cottage. Captain Hastings, recovering from some injury or other, calls on him to assist when the mother of his good friend is murdered and Poirot obliges – the two men know each other from some earlier drama on the continent. Also present is the obligatory Japp of Scotland Yard, who has also encountered the fearsome Belgian previously and his happy to let him roam free over his crime scene(s). It’s never quite clear, here or otherwise, why Japp of Scotland Yard apparently has jurisdiction over any given crime scene in any given location,

    That oft-subtle theme of encroaching modernity is very literal here, with the antagonist literally a middle-class interloper in polite, aristocratic society, who talks, dresses and acts entirely without the casual charm of the other members of the cast. What is Poirot’s role here, an outsider to British culture who is nonetheless the very image of the polite gentleman and so often engaged to defend it?

    Character Actor Watch

    David Rintoul, playing Hasting’s good friend John Cavendish, made a brief but memorable appearance as the mad King Aerys in Game of Thrones. Better yet, the improbably round-faced Mr Inglethorp, Michael Cronin, played P.E. teacher ‘Bullet’ Baxter in seventy-odd episodes of Grange Hill.

    The Mystery of the Spanish Chest

    This one is an adaptation of a short story – as many of the first three series of Poirot will be. Adapted for screen it comes in at a standard commercial TV ~40 minute slot, making an hour with adverts. It’s an odd lurch after two feature-length stories to suddenly have the plot be really quite straightforward, with necessarily less of a focus on who did the murder in question (because there are so few characters that the who is immediately obvious) and more on how. The villain in question is the charmless Colonel Curtiss, who if you couldn’t deduce it otherwise says at one heinously racist thing in every scene. He’s come up with an extremely contrived method of seeing off the husband of the object of his affections, Marguerite Clayton, after which he will presumably sweep in and claim her for himself. It’s a very gruesome murder but not much of one for the ‘little grey cells’, to coin a phrase. What livens the episode up are some strong stylistic choices, even if they’re slightly wonky in execution: the episode opens with a flashback to a duel-to-first-blood, with both sabre-wielding gentlemen decked out in their finest early-20th century protective gear. Similarly, rather than having the fellow arrested, at the end of the episode Poirot rather illicitly unleashes the man who Curtiss tried to frame on him, and cowers in the corner as the two men duke it out. Both sequences are dream-like and absurd in a way that seems very unusual for the very grounded Belgian Detective.

    Writer Watch

    Anthony Horowitz pops up here for us, probably best known for his Alex Rider series of teen spy novels in the mid-2000s but also a prolific writer of adaptations and continuations of all sorts of thriller-esque settings – he’s done both Bond and Sherlock, for instance. He’s also one of those people who decide late in life to reveal themselves to have the political acumen of a small pebble, so there’s that.

    Character Actor Watch

    A young Pip Torrens stands out as Major Rich, the framed man, and the dead man is portrayed by Malcolm Sinclair – Colonel Yularen in Andor.

    The Adventure of the Western Star

    Our first all-round dud, sunk chiefly by the weak script which is constantly struggling to find a reason for all the relevant characters to be in anything like the same place at the same time. On top of that, two of the major players are doing absolutely abominable accents that wring out any pathos that may have been available to the roles. In what could be very charitably described as an homage to Sherlock Holmes, much of the episode is given to discussing a red herring plot involving a mysterious ‘Chinaman’ [sic] whose appearance presages jewel theft. Not nearly enough is done with this idea to justify its inclusion and it gets unceremoniously dropped anyhow.

    A curiously passive role for our dear Inspector Japp of Scotland Yard in this one, where he spends the entire episode trying to collar a wealthy industrialist who he also suspects to be a gem thief – except he’s genuinely, if unpleasantly, trying to purchase the gemstone in question for money. Why is Japp after him for trying to buy a gemstone? Very strange. It all comes to a climax in a dramatic airport arrest scene where essentially nothing happens, though it was pleasing to see a depiction of London’s formerly premier airport, Croydon Aerodrome (long since superseded).

    Character Actor Watch

    Lady Yardly is played by a woefully underserved Caroline Goodall. The actor playing the awful Rolf, Oliver Cotton, was Cesare Borgia in the Borgias but much more importantly he was the stupid mask guy in the farmhouse militia mission in Hitman.

    The Adventure of the Clapham Cook

    Okay okay, it only took me five goes before I caved and went back to watch the very first one. It’s interesting to see how Suchet’s take on the role emerges pretty much fully-formed; over the course of the show he will become more cerebral and less clownish, but it’s immediately familiar – closer to the other episodes’ Poirots than Suchet’s interpretation of an early-career Poirot in The Affair at Styles, for instance. Both the scene where Poirot is infuriated by being sent a guinea for his efforts and the sequence of him dragging his perfectly polished little shoes through the countryside are impeccable bits of character work.

    Everything else here is a bit more slack unfortunately, with a cast of broad-to-the-point-of-irritating troublemakers and some dodgy script work that leaves us with very little interaction with the ostensible villain. The climax centres on a question about ship destinations that gets introduced immediately before it becomes crucial, it just doesn’t work at all. It’s puzzling that the episode is entirely built on the idea that Poirot shouldn’t take on airs and ignore the less prestigious mysteries, but the Mrs Todd who dresses him down for that turns out to be exactly what she appeared to be: an annoying busybody. Strange. Oh, there’s also a bizarre pre-credits scene with the murderer that tells you nothing at all other than who’s going to have done it. Influenced by Columbo perhaps?

    Character Actor Watch

    Dermot Crowley who plays Simpson here was the rebel General Crix Madine in Return of the Jedi, best known for his truly awful facial hair. Danny Webb, who plays an irritating porter, is apparently in the new Game of Thrones show as Ser Pennytree. Slim pickings.

    If you like my writing and want to read more, check out my (sadly truncated) 2025 Review of Film.

  • 2025 review of films

    2025 review of films

    Let’s get it out of the way up front: this has been a terrible year for my movie-watching. The baby, alluded to in my 2024 review of films, proved more and more adept at keeping me from carving out cinema visits as she grew steadily larger (within the prediction of the standardised curves which govern such things). I had a very brief patch of catching up with some Oscar nominees back in February, and since then it has been the slimmest of pickings with seven full calendar months in the year passing by without a single movie in them.

    To match this, in a stunning piece of visual metaphor the physical, real world cinema I visit caught fire this year. It was ultimately fine, with only mild water damage that has since been repaired, but talk about a bad omen. The only film I managed to see there over the course of the year was James Gunn’s Superman (of which more later) which I was obliged to see both as a terminal DC super-fan and as a connoisseur of Dog Movies. I’m hoping to make it over there for Avatar: Fire and Ash before the end of the year, which will mean having to edit this list. A similar story with Netflix’s new Knives Out: Wake Up Dead Man. (update: I made time for both!)

    I’m not going to make any kind of limitation on what gets in here: if I watched it for the first time this year, it’s going in the list.


    12. Carry-On

    Look I’ll be very honest: I don’t remember this. I had a three-month-old and this was a shit film streaming at Christmas. Die Hard 2 by way of Phone Booth? Or something? I remember the climax hinging on a contrivance about permissible cabin bag sizes, which is great commitment to the part if nothing else. Michael Bluth was in it?

    11. Superman

    I was amiable enough to this in the cinema, I slated it in review at the time, and now I hold it in contempt. Pablum and shlock, dream bigger. Dream bigger!

    That thing looks so cozy. Monks knew how to live.

    10. [This space intentionally left blank.]

    I didn’t see a tenth best film this year.

    9. The Name of the Rose

    Starring Sean Connery and Christian Slater as the only two clean men in Christendom. An enjoyable convention of grotesques in an adaptation that I felt kinda missed the point the book was making by throwing an epic rationalist in among all these superstitious monks: that modernity is an evolution of society, not fire handed down to the apes.

    8. F1

    The two things a Formula 1 team has never tried: cheating and hiring a superfluous American. Looks great though and brings a bit of that race-day magic to the screen, even if glossing over qualifying should be a capital crime.

    7. Wake Up Dead Man

    Rian Johnson does atheist G.K. Chesterton pretty well. Daniel Craig is having the time of his silly life. Like the second one, it’s somehow less than the sum of its parts, but this time some of the parts are pretty great.

    6. Anora

    This was a fun watch, bags of charisma and lots of sympathy for its characters. With hindsight I’m not too sure what it was trying to say, beyond the enjoyable yarn about a woman who sees her chance, grabs it with both hands and holds on for dear life. I just don’t think I’ll remember it? Best picture? Not sure about that, although thank God Emilia Perez didn’t get it.

    Maybe it’s just that I have infinite sympathy for scenes of baffled tourists standing on train platforms in Europe.

    5. A Real Pain

    Sometimes a film is just a great excuse to hang out with two of your favourite on-screen guys, and Jesse Eisenberg and Kieran Culkin definitely fall into that category. Eisenberg’s wound way too tight, Culkin is chronically oversharing, they’ve gone on holiday to Poland together to remember their dear departed Gran.

    4. Wicked Part One

    I don’t think there have been many successful Hollywood movies split into two parts, and I haven’t seen Part Two yet so maybe Wicked will still fluff it, but I can say that this particular split was made for me, the guy who stood up after Defying Gravity at the Apollo theatre in London circa 2008 and started putting on his coat and hat.

    People moan about the colour palette as a synecdoche for this era of digital colour but eh, it works here. Movie looks great. As I said in my review at the time, it’s fascinating seeing someone do what Disney keep trying and failing to do in recent years and hitting a home run with it.

    3. Avatar: Fire and Ash

    It has only taken sixteen years but James Cameron has convinced me. I’m a Na’vi guy now. I’m true blue. I will watch these until the end of time if he keeps making them. I hope every single one ends with a fistfight between Jake Sully and Quaritch.

    2. Danger: Diabolik

    In a year where I was starved, parched, fully withdrawn from the glory of the movies, I am so glad I managed to pack Danger: Diabolik in. Anarchic glee from the first frame to the last, all centred round the happy, healthy relationship between a man who only leaves the house in full leathers and his beautiful partner who sees things on the news and wants to steal them. Featuring possibly the worst Bond villain trap of all time, a plane with a trap door built in.

    1. The Wolf of Wall Street

    I’ve accidentally been savouring the Scorcese big hitters so this is a genuine first timer for me, and in terms of craft it’s basically flawless. Funny, infuriating, scandelous, every vignette chosen for maximum effect. Three hours float past like a dream as the guy gets it all and… well, doesn’t lose it all. Loses some of it. And that’s just how it went.


            Impressively, I don’t appear to have watched a single film from the docket list at the end of my 2024 review. Whoops!

            If you like my writing and want to read more, you can dissuade yourself of that notion by trying out “Step One: You take an onion”, my one-page party game RPG for making your friends all hate you. Otherwise I continue to review films on Letterboxd.

          1. Video games 1

            What I’ve been playing recently:

            Cyberpunk 2077

            Completed this, the first (and only) game I’ve specifically bought for my PS5. Sad to have missed the early, buggy days – long time correspondants will know that I’m convinced PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS lost a lot when all the bugs were fixed – but what’s left is an excellent open world shooty-drivey thing. I appreciated how adult it all was, not just in the shock ultraviolence but also the general, pervasive sexiness of the setting and characters. Gaming is so often stuck with arrested development in the teenage years (there’s plenty of that here as well) so when it breaks through that barrier its worth nothing. Special mention to the crucifixion quest, one of the bleakest, most cynical things I’ve seen in any fiction this year.

            Hitman: World of Assassination

            I finished the Hitman 1 missions! It’s only taken me fifteen months. It’s a great game, every level very considered, but I do wonder if I’m missing out because I don’t have the time for the in-depth mission repetition which the game keeps nudging me towards. I’d still be on that boat.

            Hades

            Celebrated the release of the Switch 2 by buying a game for my long-neglected Switch 1, which had to be gently coaxed back into retaining battery life. I almost ordered a replacement battery, glad I didn’t as it has returned to form. Hades is well scratching the itch formerly occupied by Dead Cells, and before that Nuclear Throne, for games I can very slowly get better at in short intervals. The much-vaunted writing and art is very pleasing also.

            Secret Agent Wizard Boy and the International Crime Syndicate

            I absolutely hammered the prerelease demo of this last November but haven’t had a chance to engage much with the final release; the demo benefitted from the necessity of having all the elements of gameplay within close reach which gave it a real manic energy that I struggle to summon up in the full game. That’s probably a me-problem however.

            Red Dead Redemption 2

            Finally burned those crops with the moonshine. No further comment.

            Fall Guys

            The appeal of bailing out four rounds in because you slipped trying to murder a fellow competitor-bean remains undiminished. Baffling that queueing as a three is still so unpleasant after however many years its been though.

            Tetris: The Grand Master

            I can reach S1, but S2-6 continue to evade me.

            Citizen Sleeper

            Stunning little gem that hits the Disco Elysium sensation of failing feeling more like a continuation of the story than a cause to reload. Don’t even know if you can reload, I’ve never tried. Considerably more cyberpunk than Cyberpunk, and eminently playable on a Macbook.

            Gentle People

            Cheating here; this is my game that I’ve been working on. I’ve been adding load/save as well as sketching out ideas for making the various game actions more visually interesting, with a little Sims-esque display of the band going about their business.

            Mosa Lina

            Interesting concept and fun to play, but progression requires either a bit more precision than I’m capable of giving or a bit more grind, so I eventually bounced off.

            I’m Not a Robot

            CAPTCHA-mocking fun set of online puzzles. Loved it.

            A Bird’s Minute

            Perfect little clockwork puzzle where you naturally put the available elements together to form a solution.

            Counter-strike 2

            It’s still Counter-strike. I’m missing Anubis, and Vertigo (which I never thought I’d say) but it’s nice to have Overpass back.

          2. Superman Saves the Squirrel (Superman 2025)

            Superman Saves the Squirrel (Superman 2025)

            Ringing in my ears as I enter the cinema is Pulp’s old-new single off their latest album, Got To Have Love. I don’t know how seriously I’m supposed to take this self-directed admonishment from leading man Jarvis Cocker, who so often inhabits a grim, seedy persona as the protagonist of his songs. I’m here to see the Superman film that is also about how we’ve got to have love, or kindness, or something. In its worst, most tawdry moments the script tries to get away with calling this attitude ‘punk rock’. It’s not, and the comparison lands uncomfortably similarly to those awful right-wing op-eds that call Conservatism ‘the new punk rock’ every five years. But it’s Superman, back on screen, and if Cocker can breath life back into these hoary old aphorisms then there’s no reason that seeing a straight depiction of mild-mannered reporter Clark Kent back on the big screen shouldn’t be cause for celebration.

            Before we go further, permit me to address my motivations directly to the camera – as so many characters in this film choose to do: I was dubious in my anticipation of this film. Superman (2025) is the latest effort by DC and Warner Bros to make seaworthy their idealised Whedonesque universe of heroes. It didn’t work in Justice League (2017) and it didn’t work in The Flash (2023) and that it works here is down to the careful efforts of new CEO(!) James Gunn in the twin caps of writer and director. Gunn draws liberally from the previous cinema outings for the ‘big blue boy scout’ in a manner that recalls Matt Reeves’ The Batman, and as with that film there is a note of the grim reaper’s chill hand in realising that there has now been 9 years since Batman v Superman, 12 since Man of Steel, 19 since Superman Returns and 46 since Superman (1978). It’s a haunting reminder of the passage of time, seeing these films (most of which I was around for the release of) plundered for many of their best ideas, repackaged for a new generation of cinema-goers.

            Indeed the earlier films aren’t so much referenced as ransacked: The visual design pulls from the Donner and Lester films, particularly in the elements of Krypton present. There’s a plot point pulled directly from Sidney J. Furie’s The Quest for Peace which is so prominent that it feels strange to call it an Easter Egg. There’s even a particular attention to eyeballs which speaks to an influence from the disgraced Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns. And the plot, at least until the final act, is something of a greatest-hits-tour of imagery from the two Zack Snyder movies: Superman cooking breakfast for Lois, a naive Superman intervening in foreign affairs, Superman placed in handcuffs while surrendering himself to the state. Lex Luthor turning opinion against Superman, Lex Luthor pitching killing Superman to politicians, Lex Luthor creating a monster for Superman to fight. It’s all transliterated into a post-streaming world of characters who state their feelings and intentions out loud, and action which sits solidly within a centre vertical for TikTok, but it’s recognisably the same stuff. Where there are changes, it’s to externalise and literalise: In the aftermath of his conflicts, Snyder’s Superman had to sit with the existential anguish of free choice. Gunn’s Superman has to sit with robots holding him down in the big agony chair that shoots fire at you because it hurts to be a hero.

            Sometimes a guy just has a second, secret home where he can hang out with the guys and the agony chair.

            I’m being droll but that’s not necessarily a criticism; there’s nothing inherently wrong with simplifying and literalising, though it means that this Superman is ironically often a bit more alien than he might otherwise be, oscillating in his scenes with Rachel Brosnahan’s Lois Lane between a kind of post-teenage petulance, demanding that the world be simpler so that he can act without consequence, and a detached aloofness. Fortunately Brosnahan brings her considerable talents to making the relationship seem plausible, with a nice subtle humour to the idea that – tormented by her own relationship demons – she is in a sense settling for Superman.


            One of the more perplexing elements of Superman (2025) is that in the final analysis, Superman isn’t the one to deal the meaningful blow to the hotheaded Lex Luthor. Rather, Superman being occupied contending with his nondescript clone Ultraman, the intrepid reporters of the Daily Planet crowd into Mr Terrific’s Owlship and hover over the ruins of Metropolis as they publish a front-page takedown of Luthor’s crimes to the internet. Exposed at last, and savaged by the unruly Krypto in a strange bit of dark humour, Luthor is ushered into the back of a vehicle by some of the heavily militarised operatives he spent the film directing. Presumably this sequence of events is intended to split agency over the film’s climax between Superman himself and Lois Lane, reporter at large, and it’s broadly successful. The Planet gang are a distinct if glossy bunch, and Wendell Pierce plays a delightful but brief Perry White, editor, as a man who only seems to own one cigar.

            Hoult’s Luthor is a delight, even when he’s given lines like “Super… man.”

            It’s not unusual for blockbusters to get a little All the President’s Men when depicting journalism. The myth of the crusading journalist cuts across the 20th century, from John Reed to Hunter S. Thompson. But it’s a curiously narrow take here, not even going as far as the depiction in Batman v Superman of legacy media as an honest institution in ignoble decline. The Daily Planet gang are happy, healthy, gainfully employed, and all operate out of a lush downtown office space with dedicated cubicles – hell if you’re Neo trapped in the long 90s, but positively anachronistic for a world where WeWork has been and gone. It’s curious that the plot doesn’t go anywhere near touching on the idea of Lex buying the Daily Planet, something both Smallville and the Adventures of Lois and Clark took their swings at. Jeff Bezos put his fingers on the scales at the Washington Post to keep it from endorsing a candidate in the US Presidential election; it seems odd to portray fictional journalists free from editorial intervention when the real-life ones evidently aren’t.

            You might contend that the film is really just a piece of fluff, an object of wish fulfilment and that earnest journalists who speak truth to power are of a set with the flying man with laser eyes – a cynical take, but reasonable. But the film is really very concerned with this question of the good journalist, and touches on it a few times. Lois and Clark come to sharp words in an early scene over Lois’s insistence on interviewing Superman as she would any other political figure: over her refusal to ‘print the legend’, which we are meant to assume Clark has been doing in his ethically questionable self-interviews. In a bizarre aside, Clark insists that he – Superman – doesn’t engage in social media, before naturally revealing an encyclopaedic knowledge of what people are saying about him on it. Implicitly, that’s why he needs to write these dishonest features about himself: to put right the braying masses who are speaking ill of him. Now this is not Superman’s finest hour, and so the film is quick to offer an excuse for him. During the interminable pocket universe sequence, there’s a quick visual gag in which Lex Luthor claims to have a host of barely-literate apes tasked with running Superman down online. A quirkly take on the notion of bot armies manipulating opinion for pay, this must be a comforting notion for Director Gunn, who infamously lost his job – but then quickly regained it – after a social media storm over the content of some of his old tweets. Among the feckless prisoners in Luthor’s space prison is, we are told, a blogger who wrote a negative profile of him. Presumably they’ve been preserved as the last of a dying breed. If the general quality of discourse is so poor, the suggestion seems to be, then it’s impossible to say if Superman or Lex Luthor or anyone else is good or bad – unless it’s printed by the authorities at the Daily Planet.

            Ah yeah a stun stick, that’ll do it.

            A final discordant note on social media comes with the depiction of Eve Teschmacher by a vaguely scene-stealing Sara Sampaio. Lex Luthor’s partner, she’s a constant presence alongside him taking an endless array of selfies with goofy expressions on her face, as he goes about his many crimes. Exactly why he indulges her in this is never touched on, and the degree to which she is intentionally cataloguing his sins is also frustratingly vague. For some unknown reason she’s head over heels for Skyler Gisondo’s unpleasant Jimmy Olson, who in a strange and mean-spirited bit has issues with her physical appearance. Via Olson, Teschmaker gets her crucial smoking gun of photographic evidence to Lois for publication at great personal risk, despite which Jimmy continues to shun her. In this way Eve really takes second credit for exposing Luthor and it would have been nice for her to have her moment in the Owlship also. The absence of such means that the film makes an odd distinction between the serious Lois Lane and the slightly infantile Teschmacher, as if placing them on an even keel might sully Lois with Eve’s girlish vices.

            Give her the Pulitzer!

            This aside, if there’s an Achilles’ heel to this Superman it comes in how the slightly disjointed plot doesn’t quite gel, and I’m no stranger to the prospect of stitching together multiple disconnected takes on a subject into a single whole which thus gains the appearance of deliberate creative intent. Early screenings of this film apparently made overt the formal structure of it, with title cards for each day of events proceeding linearly through a week of Superman’s life. But there’s an odd tension between the different ‘days’ of the film, some of which seem to be saying very different things to each other – the climax insists that the citizens of Metropolis can perfectly evacuate at a moment’s notice, when much of the rest of the film has hinted that they’re becoming dangerously carefree about superhero action. The absolute outlier is the aforementioned pocket universe sequence, which is visually uninspiring, reminiscent of the ugly Ant-Man 3, as well as trivial to the plot – Superman is locked in a room with only a deeply conscientious man to guard him. Whatever could happen next. Lois and Mr Terrific (a fantastic Edi Gathegi, who just sort of wills his character into having a bigger role than he does) stand in one spot for the majority of it, gazing at a distant green screen. And most oddly, Lex Luthor gets his big villain moment here: he’s picked out a man, Malik, who showed Superman basic human kindness earlier in the film, and he’s had him bound and gagged and brought before Superman, wherein Luthor shoots him in the head. It’s kind of sped past in the moment but it’s a real dark turn.

            Why’s this guy got to be the Omelas here. Whats up with that.

            Especially for a film that’s about to proceed into a third act where we are repeatedly assured, in excruciating detail, that no-one is harmed or hurt. What makes this guy so unspecial that Superman – who volunteered himself to the position where he’s unable to act to save him – gives up? Steven Moffat’s Doctor Who episodes used to have a recurring refrain of “Just this once, everybody lives!” where an episode that had seemingly settled into the regular fictional logic of tragic but unavoidable loss would rebound, go one step weirder and have the outcome be no loss at all. It’s a neat trick, and of course it’s the ending to Superman (1978), where Superman reverses time to keep Lois from dying. Not every Superman film has to be Man of Steel; if you’re making something purportedly inspired by All-Star Superman then I want to see Dr Leo Quintum popping in at the end with a hundred clones of Malik ready to go.

            The politics of the movie are the kind of cypherous mush that has been typical of the genre going all the way back to Iron Man: war is bad, but also the fault of a bad man who can be individually picked up and struck off if we only had the moral fortitude and a smart enough missile. Everyone else, from the top to the bottom, is only following orders. This goes for Luthor’s oddly diverse goon squad as well as fictional foreign actor ‘Boravia’, with the movie’s clash between a Boravian military detachment and an gathering of innocent civilians on a nondescript (although strangely small) sandy outcrop being the closest it ever gets to looking like The Flash (2023).

            This was in the trailer, I’m not sure this shot was actually in the finished film. Look at those tanks!

            Any real dive into the morality of the film is blunted not just on the ‘be kind’ platitudes but also the shifting message between the different chunks of film; early on Superman is criticised for his naïveté, at the end of the film he’s commended for his inspirational rigidity. Killing is always bad, except when it’s the cowardly and murderous Boravia president, or you’re doing the ending of Batman Begins and allowing public transport to bring your antagonist to an untimely end. Even ‘be kind’ folds in the face of ‘let your dog knock a guy about if it’s funny’.

            On a grandular level, in maybe the strongest sign of a botched script edit job, Mr Terrific appears in both a scene in the middle of the film where he’s strangly unconcerned with random antagonists milling about him as he works to shut down a portal, and a scene at the end of the film where he chews a guy out for attempting to assist him in closing the rift. Neither sits particularly well, given that the stakes for closing the rift are meant to be “the world is destroyed” and the portal in question was the one for taking people to Luthor’s extrajudicial space prison. The culpability of ordinary people is just not something the film concerns itself with – agency belongs to prime actors, business CEOs and presidents, the proud and free press, and superheroes.

            Wow, rude.

            Well, it’s not punk rock. In fact (you may be surprised to hear) it’s often quite cringe-worthy, the cynical (multiple lines confirming that someone who just fell down from space is ‘still breathing’) clashing with the earnest (Superman being so committed to 100% rescues that he’s moving squirrels about while a giant monster thrashes about). The action is mostly a bit naff and the acting is carried by a few strong players making the most of scraping their bowls clean (Nathan Fillion here operating at the elastic limit of his talent). It’s a $200 million dollar movie that leans heavily on putting a funny dog in centre view, like an episode of Britain’s Got Talent or a sequel to Soccer Dog.

            But it’s coherent, and it’s fun – something DC’s films have generally only managed one or the other of for several years now. Corenswet is a charming enough presence that you want Superman to win even though he’s an idiot, and he has genuine chemistry with Brosnahan that makes you overlook all the yelling he does. The robots are funny. Is it the bedrock of a whole new franchise of films, fifteen years of sequels as James Gunn has promised? I won’t hold my breath, and I won’t watch Creature Commandos, but stranger things have happened.